Let’s be honest, Ahrefs is one of the most respected names in SEO.
Its deep backlink data, speedy crawler, and Traffic Potential metrics have earned it a loyal following. But respect doesn’t always equal fit.
For some, the $129/month entry point feels steep. For others, it’s the pay-per-seat pricing, or the fact that certain workflows — like white-label reporting or daily rank tracking — are easier elsewhere.
Over the past year, we’ve heard more SEOs ask: Is there something leaner, cheaper, or just built differently?
To find out, we benchmarked 11 SEO platforms over 30 days. We tested each for keyword depth, backlink freshness, ease of use, and client-ready reports... including insights from Reddit threads, YouTube reviewers, and real agency use cases.
This guide walks through what we found. You'll get:
Some of these tools mirror Ahrefs’ all-in-one approach. Others break the mold entirely. Whether you're solo or scaling, there’s a stack that fits.
Here’s a quick breakdown of the best Ahrefs alternatives, each matched to the use case where it shines most.
We didn’t just skim feature lists. Our team trialed each platform in live client projects across local, ecommerce, and SaaS.
We scored each tool on data breadth, UI clarity, workflow speed, support, and price-to-value ratio. We also dug through G2, Capterra, Reddit, and YouTube reviews to spot patterns.
When a user said "this tool saved me $1000," we looked at why.
You don’t need a carbon copy of Ahrefs. You need a tool that fits how you work.
Before switching platforms, take a step back. What are the SEO tasks you run every week?
If your workflow revolves around rank tracking and content briefs, you won’t benefit from a massive backlink explorer. If you’re reporting to clients every Friday, API access and white-label options should be top of the list.
Here’s what actually moves the needle:
You can also ignore the feature tables for a second. Go try the actual workflow and see how long it takes to run a site audit, or export a top pages report.
The right fit will feel intuitive because it will match how you already think.
Related: How to use Ahrefs [Step-by-Step]
If you’re missing Ahrefs’ depth but need more marketing firepower, Semrush picks up where it leaves off.
Semrush is the only platform that can truly match Ahrefs across most SEO benchmarks.
It not only covers the core features—keywords, backlinks, site audits, rank tracking—but adds full PPC data, content tools, and social integrations on top.
In many ways, it gives you more than Ahrefs. But that “more” comes with added complexity. If you appreciated Ahrefs for its focus and speed, Semrush may feel heavier, especially at first.
In side-by-side testing, we found that Semrush’s backlink database is even larger on paper. Where Ahrefs excels in link freshness and categorization, Semrush pulls ahead with volume and paid ad visibility.
The keyword suite also offers deeper intent segmentation and better clustering for planning at scale.
Starts at 129.95 per month with a 7-day free trial. You get five projects, 500 tracked keywords, and one user. Most agencies will need to scale up quickly for more seats and reporting depth.
When our team trialed Semrush, we were impressed by the sheer range of data it pulled into one login.
But we did have to unlearn our Ahrefs habits. Exporting reports took more steps, and we had to simplify some dashboards for clients.
Still, the visibility into ad spend and organic overlap gave us insights that Ahrefs never showed.
You run a team that handles both paid and organic, and you are ready to manage more tools under one roof, even if it comes with more setup and learning.
A cost-effective all-rounder that covers 80% of what Ahrefs does, for a fraction of the price.
SE Ranking covers all five pillars of Ahrefs without the high price tag. It is one of the few tools that consistently surprises people who expect limitations based on cost.
While its backlink database is smaller, it makes up for it with white-label reporting, lead-gen tools, and agency-focused flexibility.
What stood out in testing was how much SE Ranking does with less. The link index is not as deep, but it still finds key referring domains. Rank tracking is refreshingly accurate and updates daily without pushing you into a higher tier. The site audit tool caught some issues that Ahrefs missed, and we appreciated the ability to re-crawl instantly without waiting for quotas.
Starts at 39 per month for 250 tracked keywords, ten projects, and daily updates. Includes a 14-day free trial with full access.
SE Ranking feels like a tool built for people doing the work. It gets out of your way and lets you move fast. We onboarded new clients with zero friction, and the reports looked polished out of the box. When we needed deeper link context or large-scale exports, we still pulled Ahrefs—but SE Ranking handled 90 percent of the day-to-day.
You manage clients, work across multiple sites, and want a full SEO suite that does not force compromises or burn your software budget.
If Ahrefs feels like too much, Mangools gives you the essentials without the overload.
Mangools is not trying to go punch-for-punch with Ahrefs. Instead, it wins by simplifying. It bundles five tools (KWFinder, SERPChecker, SERPWatcher, LinkMiner, and SiteProfiler) into one interface that is light, fast, and user-friendly.
You still get keyword research, SERP previews, backlink insights, and basic tracking, but without the complexity or steep cost.
In our experience, Mangools works best when you do not need to track hundreds of domains or sift through massive datasets.
Where Ahrefs gives you granular control and link data at scale, Mangools offers speed, clarity, and a clean UI.
You will not get advanced filters, Top Pages reports, or multi-domain comparisons. But for small teams or solo operators, that is not always a dealbreaker.
Starts at 29.90 per month. That includes access to all five tools and 200 keyword lookups per day. A free version allows ten searches daily.
Mangools is the tool I open when I want answers fast. It loads quickly, the SERP views are clean, and the keyword metrics are enough for content targeting.
For serious link audits or advanced campaigns, we still leaned on Ahrefs. But for early-stage planning or small-site tracking, Mangools handled the job.
You run one or two sites, focus on content SEO, and want clear insights without getting buried in filters, exports, or training videos.
It does not try to be Ahrefs, but for the price, it covers the basics surprisingly well.
Ubersuggest delivers a stripped-down version of what most solo SEOs or creators need. You get keyword research, site audits, basic backlink data, and even content suggestions, all at a price that’s hard to argue with. It is not a direct substitute for Ahrefs in terms of depth or precision, but for newer users or low-budget projects, it gives you enough to take action.
Compared to Ahrefs, the keyword data is less expansive, backlink tracking is more surface level, and rank tracking updates only weekly. But Ubersuggest shines in accessibility. It is easy to learn, includes an AI writer and Chrome extension, and still delivers value for people not doing deep forensic work or managing client portfolios.
Starts at 12 per month with a limited free version. Lifetime deals are often available starting around 120. Entry plans include keyword research, one domain audit, and content tools.
I have used Ubersuggest for lightweight projects where we just needed to validate topics or get a quick site check. It is not the tool I’d use for a client audit or link-building campaign, but for freelancers, small business owners, or bloggers, it packs in more than expected at this price point.
You are early in your SEO journey or need a tool that covers keyword research and audits without committing to a higher monthly spend.
You get less raw data than Ahrefs, but the interface and support make up for it—especially if you work with clients.
Moz Pro has been part of the SEO conversation for over a decade. While it no longer leads on data size or speed, it earns a spot on this list by doing core SEO tasks well and making them feel approachable. If Ahrefs feels too data-dense or you need something that’s easier to hand off to non-SEOs, Moz is a strong candidate.
You will notice some clear trade-offs. Ahrefs gives you deeper keyword and backlink data, faster updates, and broader filtering. Moz, on the other hand, offers solid technical audits, daily rank tracking, and a keyword tool that focuses on click-through potential—not just volume. Its Domain Authority metric remains a go-to reference point in many SEO communities, even if Ahrefs' DR now rivals it in usage.
Starts at 99 per month for one user and three campaigns. Includes a 30-day free trial, which is longer than most competitors offer.
Moz Pro has been the easiest tool to hand off to junior team members or clients. The reports are readable, the metrics are easy to explain, and setup is straightforward. That said, for competitive audits or backlink deep dives, we always turn to Ahrefs.
You want a trusted, easy-to-learn SEO platform with enough depth to manage rankings and on-page work—without needing to be a data analyst.
Strong in structure, smart in price, but still a step behind Ahrefs in link depth and freshness.
Serpstat stands out for its balance of usability and scope. It offers keyword research, rank tracking, site audits, and backlink tools, all in one platform. What it lacks in data volume compared to Ahrefs, it makes up for in structure. The platform is built around visibility, keyword clustering, and progress tracking—making it especially useful for content teams and SEO generalists.
Compared to Ahrefs, Serpstat’s backlink database is smaller and its crawler is less aggressive. But its keyword tools shine when you want to plan content at scale or build clustered strategies around topics. We also found the Tree View audit helpful for visualizing a site’s technical structure, something Ahrefs handles with lists and metrics rather than visual context.
Starts at 50 per month with a 7-day trial. Includes full access to core SEO modules, daily updates, and entry-level project limits.
Serpstat became our go-to for campaign mapping and keyword clustering. The Tree View helped us visualize crawl and indexation issues quickly. Still, we reached for Ahrefs any time a client needed backlink clarity or deep SERP history.
You build SEO strategies around content planning, and want a tool that organizes keywords, tracks visibility, and keeps projects moving—even if it means giving up some link precision.
Outsmarts the competition on paid insights, but does not come close to Ahrefs in backlink depth.
SpyFu is not a full-suite SEO tool like Ahrefs or Semrush, but it brings something valuable to the table—competitive intelligence. Where Ahrefs focuses on link data and organic keywords, SpyFu pulls back the curtain on your competitors’ ad history, keyword bidding strategy, and SERP overlaps. If your SEO strategy is closely tied to paid search, this platform fills a gap that Ahrefs never tried to cover.
In practice, SpyFu’s backlink data is too light to rely on for audits or link building. But its unlimited search model, historical PPC insights, and easy UI make it a strong complement to Ahrefs—or a budget alternative when you care more about strategy than technical deep dives.
Starts at 39 per month. All plans include unlimited data access, but advanced exports and historical depth require upgrades. No free trial, but a 30-day money-back guarantee is available.
We used SpyFu when clients wanted insights into competitor ad budgets or keyword drops. It gave us answers Ahrefs could not, especially on PPC crossover. But when it came time to do technical audits or link-building analysis, we always went back to Ahrefs.
You run integrated SEO and paid search campaigns, and want fast competitive intel without paying for an enterprise suite.
If your entire SEO strategy is built around links, Majestic gives you clarity and context—just not the full suite Ahrefs offers.
Majestic is a legacy tool that still holds strong in one specific area: backlink data. It does not attempt to be an all-in-one platform. You won’t find keyword tools, rank tracking, or audits here. But if you live inside link profiles, it offers some of the most respected proprietary metrics in SEO—Trust Flow and Citation Flow.
When we ran domain comparisons side by side with Ahrefs, Majestic surfaced more historical link patterns and did a better job of categorizing links by topic. What you lose is usability. The interface is dated, reports require interpretation, and there is little support for integrations or exports. But for SEOs who need to audit link equity or analyze networks, it is still one of the most specialized tools available.
Starts at 49.99 per month. The entry plan includes limited access to full backlink data. No free trial, but demo data is available to preview the core tools.
Majestic helped us uncover why a client’s backlink profile looked strong on paper but failed to drive rankings—most links were off-topic or buried in footers. That kind of nuance is hard to get anywhere else.
You specialize in link audits, recovery, or competitive backlink analysis and already use other tools for rankings and content.
If Ahrefs gives you the data, Raven helps you present it—especially when clients expect clarity over complexity.
Raven Tools is less about data discovery and more about delivery. It does include keyword tracking, site audits, and backlink tools, but its standout feature is the reporting engine. You can build polished, white-label SEO reports that pull from multiple sources—something Ahrefs does not support natively. If client communication is a core part of your SEO business, Raven fills a gap that Ahrefs leaves wide open.
That said, you will not get the same depth of analysis. Raven’s link data comes from third-party sources and lacks the real-time freshness of Ahrefs. Its keyword and audit modules are useful but not built for power users. But if your goal is to show progress, summarize impact, and automate delivery, it brings a ton of value with less manual lift.
Starts at 39 per month with four domains and one user. A 7-day free trial is available. Higher tiers unlock more domains and team access.
We used Raven Tools to package insights from Ahrefs, Google Ads, and Analytics into one client-ready PDF. It saved hours of deck-building and kept reporting consistent—even when account managers changed.
You already have solid data sources like Ahrefs, but need a faster, more polished way to report results to clients and stakeholders.
You give up some convenience, but you get lifetime control. No recurring bills, no project limits.
SEO PowerSuite is different from most tools on this list. It is not a cloud-based SaaS platform like Ahrefs. Instead, it is a set of downloadable desktop applications that run locally on your machine. This changes everything—from pricing structure to performance. You buy it once, install it, and manage unlimited projects without worrying about monthly caps.
In terms of features, it mirrors much of what Ahrefs offers: site audits, backlink analysis, keyword research, and rank tracking. But it leans on external APIs for some data, and its backlink database is far smaller. Still, for consultants, solo operators, or anyone who wants total control without an ongoing subscription, it remains a strong alternative.
Free version available with usage caps. Full Professional license is 299 as a one-time fee. Optional yearly updates and support are available but not required.
We used SEO PowerSuite for a client that had strict data privacy requirements—no cloud storage allowed. It did everything we needed without hitting project ceilings or worrying about usage. But when we needed faster link intel or keyword data at scale, Ahrefs still filled those gaps.
You want complete control over your SEO toolkit, prefer to pay once and own your tools, and are comfortable working locally without cloud-based collaboration.
Less of a suite, more of a scalpel. When rankings drop and the cause isn’t obvious, this is where you turn.
cognitiveSEO is not trying to replace Ahrefs feature for feature. Instead, it dives deeper into two specific areas: content optimization and backlink risk analysis. Where Ahrefs gives you massive coverage, cognitiveSEO gives you diagnostic precision. It is especially valuable for penalty audits, unnatural link detection, and content scoring based on real-time SERP analysis.
In side-by-side use, cognitiveSEO found issues that Ahrefs did not flag—especially with toxic links and thin content risk. Its TF-IDF content optimization is more nuanced than Ahrefs’ on-page features, and it includes a dedicated tool to audit anchor text patterns. However, you will not find a rank tracker or full audit tool here, and the interface requires some patience.
Starts at 129 per month. Includes access to all content and backlink tools. A 7-day trial is available to explore full functionality.
We used cognitiveSEO on a site that had lost half its traffic overnight. Ahrefs showed the same top links, but only cognitiveSEO flagged the patterns that pointed to a link penalty. That insight helped guide a cleanup and reconsideration request that ultimately worked.
You handle technical SEO, penalty recoveries, or forensic audits, and you need a second opinion when standard tools stop short.
Ahrefs tells you where the gaps are. Surfer helps you close them—one optimized paragraph at a time.
Surfer SEO does not aim to replace Ahrefs across the board. Instead, it fills a critical gap in the content workflow. Where Ahrefs is strong in keyword research and site audits, Surfer picks up the baton when it's time to optimize copy. It analyzes the top-ranking pages for your target keyword, breaks down their structure, and scores your content against theirs in real time.
What makes Surfer compelling is how fast it makes on-page optimization actionable. You can feed it a draft or start from scratch, and it will suggest word counts, headings, related keywords, and NLP terms—all based on live SERP analysis. While Ahrefs gives you data to inform what to write, Surfer guides you through how to write it.
Starts at 89 per month. Plans scale based on the number of content editor credits and audit runs. A limited free trial is available.
We used Surfer to rewrite a batch of blog posts that were stuck on page two. Within two weeks of optimization, five moved to the top three results. It gave the writing team clarity that traditional SEO dashboards couldn’t.
You produce content at scale and want every piece to follow a SERP-informed structure that aligns with what Google is already rewarding.
You would not replace Ahrefs with this, but you might use it to move faster when time or team size is tight.
Writesonic’s SEO Agent is part of a growing trend: AI-powered assistants built to streamline content strategy. It pulls live SERP insights and uses them to suggest keywords, page titles, meta descriptions, and full content outlines. While Ahrefs gives you massive datasets to explore, Writesonic focuses on speed and structure—helping you ideate, plan, and draft content much faster.
It lacks the link data, technical audit features, and raw keyword volume that define Ahrefs. But when you need to build out a blog calendar, identify topic gaps, or generate outlines at scale, it plays a valuable role. During our tests, we used it to draft SEO briefs in under five minutes—something that would typically take an hour of cross-checking SERPs and spreadsheets.
Starts at 19 per month for content tools. The SEO Agent is included in higher-tier Writesonic plans. Free trial includes limited AI credits.
We used Writesonic to generate ten content briefs for a new blog section in one afternoon. The structure it created was surprisingly close to what we would build manually using Ahrefs and Surfer combined. It did not replace the data, but it sped up the setup.
You want to accelerate content production or support a lean team with AI-generated SEO structure, and you already have another tool covering keyword research and link tracking.
Not a pure Ahrefs alternative, but an AI-powered layer that helps you package and deliver SEO work faster.
Search Atlas pitches itself as an all-in-one SEO solution, but in practice, it functions more like a workflow booster than a database powerhouse. You will find tools for keyword research, content optimization, rank tracking, and audits, but the real strength is in how it combines those features with client-facing outputs—especially white-label reports and branded dashboards.
Compared to Ahrefs, the data is thinner and less transparent. You get a lot of features on paper, but not always the depth behind them. However, what it does well is streamline delivery. If you are spending too much time formatting reports, guiding clients through SEO priorities, or organizing team tasks, Search Atlas can fill that gap.
Starts around 49 per month, based on public listings and user feedback. Pricing scales with users and client access. Free trial availability varies.
Search Atlas helped us standardize reporting for five small clients where SEO was just one part of their marketing mix. We still pulled core data from Ahrefs, but this tool made packaging and explaining the work much easier.
You run an agency or consultancy where delivery speed and client communication matter more than technical depth, and you are already using another platform for raw SEO analysis.
If Ahrefs feels like work, Morningscore makes SEO feel like progress. It won’t match the depth, but it will keep you moving.
Morningscore takes a different approach to SEO. Instead of throwing massive data sets at you, it wraps your workflow in a game-like dashboard—complete with missions, scores, and a visual roadmap. You still get rank tracking, keyword monitoring, link tracking, and site audits, but all delivered in a format that’s designed to motivate, not overwhelm.
When stacked against Ahrefs, Morningscore falls short in keyword breadth, backlink data, and technical filters. But for site owners, startups, or marketers who need to stay consistent and focused, it provides just enough information and a clear sense of direction. The gamified approach makes it a great tool for staying on track without needing to be an SEO expert.
Starts at 49 per month with a free plan available for small sites. All paid tiers include rank tracking, link monitoring, and the full mission system.
We used Morningscore to keep a non-technical client engaged between strategy calls. They completed audits, fixed meta tags, and tracked progress—all without asking for guidance. That kind of autonomy would be hard to get from Ahrefs or Semrush.
You want to keep SEO moving forward on a small site or team, and you value motivation and usability over raw data power.
These are not Ahrefs replacements, but they can still serve a role—especially when your budget or needs are minimal.
These tools are not trying to compete with Ahrefs on data scale or depth. Instead, they carve out focused slices of the SEO workflow. SEOtoolbox packages lightweight keyword tracking, backlink checks, and alerts into a simple UI. LinkGraph’s SERPTrends is focused on rank tracking and visibility monitoring, often used as a daily pulse tool. Seobility offers strong technical audits and TF-IDF analysis through an accessible interface, and remains one of the few free SEO platforms that can actually do real work.
If you are coming from Ahrefs, you will immediately notice what’s missing: advanced filters, large databases, competitor research, and the polish that comes with years of refinement. But for freelancers, local businesses, or early-stage site owners, these tools can be just enough to monitor rankings, catch issues, and take basic SEO action.
We often recommend Seobility to early clients who need to take control of their site health before investing in a full suite. For quick wins, it’s hard to beat. But when the time comes to build a strategy, these tools can only take you so far.
You have one small site, a limited budget, or need a lightweight tool to stay informed—and you are not yet ready to invest in an enterprise-grade platform like Ahrefs.
No tool does it all. The best one is the one that fits your workflow, your budget, and your goals.
If you are looking to replicate Ahrefs’ full feature set and data depth, Semrush is still the closest match. It delivers keyword volume, backlink breadth, technical audits, and even adds features Ahrefs lacks, like PPC insights and content briefs. Just be prepared to manage more complexity.
If you need value without sacrificing core functionality, SE Ranking gives you all the essentials—daily rank tracking, backlink monitoring, site audits—at a much lower price. Mangools is even more streamlined, with a clean interface and fast keyword workflows for creators and niche site builders.
When the focus shifts to content optimization, Surfer SEO and Writesonic’s SEO Agent help close the gap between strategy and execution. Neither replaces Ahrefs, but they move quickly and support fast-moving teams.
For link specialists, Majestic and cognitiveSEO go deeper into link quality, risk scoring, and anchor analysis than most all-in-ones can. And if you are looking to simplify client reporting, Raven Tools and Search Atlas offer workflow tools that Ahrefs never built in.
Finally, for those just starting out or working with smaller sites, tools like Seobility, Morningscore, or LinkGraph SERPTrends provide structure and visibility without the steep price tag.
The best path forward? Start with a trial. Match a few tools to your use case. And remember, even many agencies we spoke with do not rely on just one platform. Your best stack may include Ahrefs—just not only Ahrefs.
Jump directly to a section: